Switzerland is cosidered to be a tax haven for some
categories of residents and certain types of companies. However, for the Swiss
citizens it is not true, though the Swiss taxation system is not
similar to the fiscal sharing used in Scandinavian states or Italy. |
|
The Ticino is between the
three Cantons in which the taxes to pay are low. If in Switzerland the
mean load is 100 francs, in Ticino it is 71,7. In 2002 it was
83,2. |
|
Natural person taxes |
Switzerland is one of the best places in the world from
the fiscal point of view for the people who live there on the interest
of their investment, despite the allocation of the capital as shares,
securities or investments. Usually such persons are welcome in
Switzerland, and the only tax that should be paid is a fixed global tax
which is similar to the rents that they pay in Switzerland
irrespective of their real income. Many outstanding sportsmen,
movie-stars and businessmen already make use of this unique opportunity.
Switzerland provides for the chance to live in the centre of Europe, which
allows them to get use of all benefits guaranteed by this secure and
well-being country and to protect their income from exorbitant
taxation with any relevant service ensured. |
|
Proficient taxes/ taxes on
the companies |
The ordinary Swiss companies pay taxes to variable
shares, depending on their activity and location. In certain
circumstances, the Swiss companies can pay really low taxes, usually
amounting 9 % of the yield. This is applied, first of all to the
multinational holding and business companies which
concentrate their activity beyond Switzerland; however, they have the legal
seat in preferred tax cantons which provide for the tax discount. For example, the
Ticino is the thirth among the other Swiss cantons (from the fiscal point of view) and
represents a beneficial opportunity to the foreign investor. The
canton Geneva, takes the last place among all 23 cantons that compose Switzerland. One
should remember that
Switzerland is one Federal State, like Germany and the United States
of America. |
|
TOTAL INDEX OF THE FISCAL
CARGO |
Average
Switzerland =
100 |
Rank |
Cantons |
Individual |
Legal Person |
Circulation |
Total
2003 |
Total 2002 |
1 |
Zug |
49.8 |
54.0 |
82.1 |
52.3 |
50.7 |
2 |
Schwiz |
65.5 |
49.0 |
95.7 |
64.5 |
62.8 |
3 |
Ticino |
63.3 |
93.4 |
92.2 |
71.7 |
85.2 |
4 |
Nidwalden |
77.5 |
73.6 |
81.2 |
77.0 |
75.9 |
5 |
Aargau |
81.3 |
110.3 |
74.3 |
84.6 |
82.3 |
6 |
Zürich |
85.6 |
106.3 |
95.9 |
90.0 |
89.9 |
7 |
Geneva |
82.8 |
130.2 |
78.8 |
93.1 |
91.8 |
8 |
Appenzell Innerrhoden |
101.1 |
65.5 |
96.4 |
96.5 |
94.2 |
9 |
Basel
country |
94.6 |
116.8 |
110.6 |
98.2 |
95.6 |
10 |
Thurgau |
103.1 |
97.7 |
70.1 |
101.4 |
101.4 |
11 |
Vaud |
100.0 |
109.8 |
129.9 |
102.7 |
111.9 |
12 |
S. Gallen |
105.3 |
101.7 |
103.4 |
104.7 |
100.9 |
13 |
Appenzell Ausserrhoden |
113.6 |
78.4 |
115.3 |
110.3 |
108.1 |
14 |
Schaffhausen |
120.4 |
87.4 |
64.8 |
114.4 |
112.8 |
15 |
Bern |
115.3 |
92.2 |
136.9 |
114.4 |
112.0 |
16 |
Graubünden |
107.0 |
141.7 |
135.5 |
114.9 |
110.8 |
17 |
Solothurn |
117.9 |
111.4 |
88.1 |
115.9 |
112.6 |
18 |
Glarus |
117.7 |
115.6 |
101.8 |
116.6 |
111.5 |
19 |
Basel city |
115.3 |
122.2 |
106.9 |
116.8 |
119.2 |
20 |
Luzern |
128.1 |
99.8 |
95.3 |
124.3 |
124.4 |
21 |
Neuchâtel |
131.5 |
118.1 |
99.1 |
128.2 |
125.6 |
22 |
Wallis |
141.3 |
116.1 |
53.3 |
135.6 |
129.9 |
23 |
Freiburg |
139.7 |
115.2 |
107.3 |
135.7 |
132.7 |
24 |
Jura |
139.4 |
114.1 |
125.2 |
135.9 |
130.5 |
25 |
Uri |
144.3 |
118.7 |
80.3 |
137.9 |
133.1 |
26 |
Obwalden |
149.5 |
103.3 |
89.4 |
143.1 |
144.4 |
|
|
To determine the position of the Ticino one should
keep in mind that it has the low level of imposition applied to the
natural persons, taking the fifth place in the average. While in the rest of the confederation the
taxes amount is 100
franc, in the Ticino it is less than 81. In reality,
in Ticino the taxes are within 20 % regarding the Swiss average. |
|
Since 2003 with the lowering of
another half point of the aliquot on the capital (the 1.5 for
thousands) and the sequential abolishment of the stamp-duty it would
have to contribute to further lowering of the average fiscal
pressure on the legal person. |
|
|